The Latvian
parliament, the Saeima, is elected through proportional elections with open
lists, whereby voters can affect the order of the candidates in their lists by
adding a plus to the names of the candidates they favour or deleting the names
of those whom they disfavour. Until the 10th Saeima elections on
October 2nd, 2010 candidates could stand for election in more than
one electoral district, there being five such districts in total. Should they qualify
for election in more than one district they would enter parliament from the
district where they obtained most votes. This meant that candidates elected in
one district, usually from one of the two largest (Riga and Vidzeme) vacated
places for candidates next in line on their lists in the three smallest
districts (Latgale, Zemgale and Kurzeme). The practice had several undesirable
effects and allowed party leaders to manipulate to a considerable degree which
candidates from their list would get into parliament, i.e. who would fill their
vacated places. In 2007 the Electoral Reform Society (of Latvia) – “Vēlēšanu reformas biedrība”, hereinafter VEL – proposed an amendment to stop
this practice and allow candidates to stand for election in only one electoral
district. The amendment, submitted by the New Era party (“Jaunais laiks” or
“JL”) and demanded by Latvia’s President Valdis Zatlers, was passed into law on
February 26, 2009 by the Saeima with 68 votes in favour, 11 against, 11 abstentions
and 10 deputies not voting. Thus, at the
10th Saeima elections candidates, who themselves did not receive
sufficient voter support to get elected, could no longer be shunted into places
vacated by their party “locomotives” to be their surrogates. This report,
prepared by the Electoral Reform Society (of Latvia) reviews the reaction to
the amendment by political parties, members of the VEL advisory council and
voters, and its possible impact on the election results.
The reaction of
voters was gleaned from a survey, commissioned by VEL with SKDS, a Latvian
polling organization, from October 9 to 21, 2010 with a random sample of 847 personal
interviews with Latvian citizens, of whom 653 had participated in the 10th
Saeima elections.
|